Veitch Penny Solicitors

Welcome to www.vplaw.co.uk

Adjudicator ‘Had No Jurisdiction’ in £1.6 Million Contract Dispute

Published: 01 December 2014, in categories: Legal Updates | Commercial Litigation Updates | News and Updates

Many find adjudication a swift and cost-effective means of settling contract disputes. However, in one striking case, an adjudicator’s decision in a dispute relating to the installation of communications equipment on the London tube merely served to fire the starting gun on lengthy and expensive litigation.

Company A had sub-contracted company B to carry out installation work. Relations between the parties were troubled by claims of delay and disruption and company A ultimately sought to dispense with company B’s services. The latter submitted the dispute to an adjudicator, who awarded it more than £1.6 million.

Company B asked the High Court to grant summary judgment, enforcing the award. However, in rejecting that application, the Court found that company A had ‘real prospects’ of establishing that the adjudicator – who was appointed by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors – had lacked jurisdiction to resolve the dispute.

Company A had put forward ‘a sufficiently strong case’ that the adjudicator was not properly appointed due to a fraudulent misrepresentation by those acting on behalf of company B. Company A also had a strong argument that the adjudicator had trespassed into areas of dispute – particularly in relation to the value of the claim – which had already been ruled upon following an earlier adjudication.

  • 0.0/5 rating (0 votes)
  • Social Buttons:
  • Author: Veitch Penny LLP

Veitch Penny Feedback & Reviews

Veitch Penny Feedback & Reviews

Veitch Penny Feedback & Reviews

Veitch Penny now accept feedback by Feefo. To find out what our clients have to say about us, simply click on the blue bar below ...

Click to show reviews from our customers...

Click to show reviews from our customers...

Approachable | Innovative | Practical